![]() The second benefit is that the CNC operator can make adjustments to the program (swap a tool because 128 is being sharpened today) with no difficulty at all. By using the MPR method, all the 'Rapid - G0' motions are guaranteed to be away from the part, as these are all provided by the NC generated and the templates (per machine type). In my opinion, the second is by far the safer method. The second is to get a CAM program that generates MPR programs instead of G-Code. In general programs cannot be stopped and restarted in the middle and operators cannot adjust the programs. The first is to have CAM generated G-Code wrapped into the MPR which is basically telling the NC-Generate to accept the G-Code as is. This is what makes it possible to send the same program to two very different machines (different controllers, tools etc) and still end up with the same part. It is only in the 'NC Generate' step that the NCWEEKE.exe or NCHOMAG.exe takes templates of the (machine specific) drilling process with G0-G81 etc and fills in the blank. "I want a hole at X, Y with diameter 8mm, 12mm deep. These macros are details - without instructions. In woodwop we program 'Macros' or 'Processes' in general terms. Then it will be easier to see, how and where we can use externally generated 'programs'. ![]() I know this is an older post but it may be worth providing a complete answer here for those who are searching for a solution.įirst, lets talk about the Woodwop -> Machined part process. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |